gbrljms

Jun 07
elektricfeel:

atthedanceparty:

the-best-on-mars:

jessikerz:

obsessive:

hello-therelove:

sneakerface:

glasnost:

Quick psychological test administered to Russian Soldiers. If you don’t see a number in each circle, here’s why:
Can’t see circle 1: High agression, proneness to conflict, the recommendation is to add more physical excercise and cold showers.
Can’t see circle 2: Possible low than average intellectual abilities, can’t serve with sophisticated equipment.
Can’t see circle 3: Possible debauchery, soldier should get increased daily ration, should get more physical activity tasks, should not be connected to food supplies, etc.
Can’t see circle 4: Possible inclination to violence, can be assigend as a leader to his unit, as he can preserve discipline.
Can’t see circle 5: Possible latent homosexuality. Can be light uncontrolled accesses of attraction to the same sex.
Can’t see circle 6: Possible schizophreanic tendency. Required additional inspection.
Please someone tell me if they see a number in circle 5. 

I can’t see #’s 3,5, or 6 and I can barely see the number in #4.  I think it mostly has to do with my DICHROMATIC COLORBLINDNESS though.  fricken russian physiologists.

yeah, i can’t see 5.

I can’t see 5 either, does this mean everyone is a tad homosexual?
lmao i cant see 5 either.. i think their just trying to play us.


Haha, this got me for a scecond. There’s nothing in 5.

I can’t see 5 either.

they must be shitting us. girls are gross and have cooties.

THERE IS NO NUMBER IN 5.
… trust the gay guy to go into photoshop and check. ha.
no worries ladies!

elektricfeel:

atthedanceparty:

the-best-on-mars:

jessikerz:

obsessive:

hello-therelove:

sneakerface:

glasnost:

Quick psychological test administered to Russian Soldiers. If you don’t see a number in each circle, here’s why:

Can’t see circle 1: High agression, proneness to conflict, the recommendation is to add more physical excercise and cold showers.

Can’t see circle 2: Possible low than average intellectual abilities, can’t serve with sophisticated equipment.

Can’t see circle 3: Possible debauchery, soldier should get increased daily ration, should get more physical activity tasks, should not be connected to food supplies, etc.

Can’t see circle 4: Possible inclination to violence, can be assigend as a leader to his unit, as he can preserve discipline.

Can’t see circle 5: Possible latent homosexuality. Can be light uncontrolled accesses of attraction to the same sex.

Can’t see circle 6: Possible schizophreanic tendency. Required additional inspection.

Please someone tell me if they see a number in circle 5.

I can’t see #’s 3,5, or 6 and I can barely see the number in #4. I think it mostly has to do with my DICHROMATIC COLORBLINDNESS though. fricken russian physiologists.

yeah, i can’t see 5.

I can’t see 5 either, does this mean everyone is a tad homosexual?

lmao i cant see 5 either.. i think their just trying to play us.

Haha, this got me for a scecond. There’s nothing in 5.

I can’t see 5 either.

they must be shitting us. girls are gross and have cooties.

THERE IS NO NUMBER IN 5.

… trust the gay guy to go into photoshop and check. ha.

no worries ladies!

  1. homedecorlighting reblogged this from caitlinhill
  2. auto-insurance-quotes-today reblogged this from caitlinhill
  3. estantres reblogged this from caitlinhill
  4. 1blainebomercarlosean7 reblogged this from crumbler
  5. intothemind-ofanartist reblogged this from justgivemenovember and added:
    holy shit im gay!
  6. jennasdinosaur reblogged this from wearethefallinginhavana and added:
    5.. hm well i am bi so this makes sense right? :b
  7. wearethefallinginhavana reblogged this from justgivemenovember
  8. darksun173 reblogged this from sscheibe
  9. chocobunnii reblogged this from justgivemenovember and added:
    I can’t see 5 lol :)
  10. gnatchan reblogged this from justgivemenovember and added:
    Can’t see 5. Not a secret that I’m half a lesbian.
  11. boingboingwhoosh reblogged this from feliciaeatsrainbows and added:
    Latent homosexuality? LATENT? trololol
  12. willtravel reblogged this from feliciaeatsrainbows and added:
    This is total BS, jsyk. Your ability to process color has yet to have any correlation with your sexuality or any other...
  13. drchellechemist reblogged this from psychopornographic
  14. willrhowe reblogged this from con-tagious and added:
    that’s because it’s got nothing to do with what it says it’s testing. it’s just a test for colour blindness and not...
  15. heatherrheld reblogged this from justgivemenovember and added:
    This has nothing to do with psychology…it’s a basic color blindness test…
  16. marshallboy reblogged this from pixieblood
  17. bestxtrappa reblogged this from justgivemenovember and added:
    So you’re telling me I’m a lesbian?
  18. pixieblood reblogged this from con-tagious
  19. brayray reblogged this from silverlakes and added:
    gosh. i can’t see a number in 5 circle too. lol
  20. left-brained reblogged this from anthonystarkk and added:
    There’s no number in 5. Like… At all.
  21. silverlakes reblogged this from con-tagious and added:
    Yay i’m gay. Hurray! I hope you sense the sarcasm…
  22. lilbit03 reblogged this from justgivemenovember and added:
    i see a number in EVERY circle EXCEPT circle #5
  23. anthonystarkk reblogged this from con-tagious and added:
    I can see them all but 5 lol
  24. mynamesbetty reblogged this from sscheibe and added:
    I can’t see 5.
  25. flashesofgoldd reblogged this from justgivemenovember and added:
    I cant see #5. I aint even mad.
  26. con-tagious reblogged this from crotcheggs and added:
    i think they deliberately put nothing in 5 so we all think we’re homosexual
  27. sscheibe reblogged this from justgivemenovember
  28. crotcheggs reblogged this from justgivemenovember and added:
    i cannot see 5 at all seriously.
  29. live-trama-die reblogged this from justgivemenovember and added:
    Can’t see Number 5, yet.. I like cock…
  30. thepiscesplace reblogged this from justgivemenovember
  31. justgivemenovember reblogged this from wikileafs
  32. wikileafs posted this